🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are observing closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Movement

In Europe, a increasing group of countries are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that smartphones and apps are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". A law is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have stated that an similar ban could be "a potential options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on the legislature to pass a proposal raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended families to restrict their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a advisory statement supporting a ban for minors unless guardian approval is granted. While it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a useful first step," commented the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by robust evidence".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. One foundation set up by the relatives of a young person who died after encountering dangerous online content argues that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to design products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a leading peer.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, regulation is primarily occurring at the local level amid federal inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law capping under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra access requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws mandating guardian approval for minors to create social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from various politicians to follow this lead, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, other countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, world organizations strike a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could backfire". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide debate continues, the policies of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers internationally are no longer content to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.